Lula wants to nationalize OUR CHILDREN, NOT ONLY THAT: PUNISH THE PARENTS WANT DECENT, since Naughty continue to do WHAT EVER MADE

Before Lula declare God and have chosen Dilma as the anointed, he kept saying that the Brazilians were his children. "Daddy is the king of bad example. It has already been fined six times by the TSE, abuses of authority to make the election campaign, goes hand in mensaleiro head, heads a government that illegally breaking the bank secrecy of caretaker and supervisor of the opposition leader. Brothers! Dad did not follow the bad examples! Well, as we are their "children", he decided to nationalize their grandchildren - in this case, our children. Now they all belong to ... Lula!

The government sent a draft to Congress banning the spanking - and pinches. Father who gives a slap in the ass kid who throws himself on the floor in the mall to buy a schism because diving can be terminated. The slap on the ass, my friend, is now a matter of state. Now, this state can either do yourself a plant of Belo Monte and afford the insurance operation as it can criminalize the slap - slipper, then, must turn into the heinous crime. True for children and adolescents as well.

As we know, one of the problems of education is the passivity of the teenagers when they receive an order from their parents. Not any more! Now they can go to the nearest police station and report those monsters for "corporal punishment". "Doctor, he slapped me in the ass!"

"Our concern is not with the spanking. Our concern is with the repeated slapping and spanking trend that evolves to beatings, burns, fractures, death threats. "
Wow! Speech is the under secretary of Promotion of the Rights of the Child and Adolescent, Carmen Oliveira, Department of Human Rights. Ah, it is a subject of Paul Vannuchi. It all makes sense. In that world lives this lady? What kind of fantasy is that?

Project Squid, is it? I'm here thinking: was the lack of spanking that led to creating Lulinha Gamecorp? Spanking or have missed before, the boy's father? In that film, Mikado, Lula's mother protects the child of an alcoholic father beating. Now Brazil has to pay the bill because the president, it seems, had an absent father and violent - at least that's what he says - which prevented him from having superego. This latter finding is not part of my ironies, no! This is a psychoanalytic truth. Consult a specialist.

Now comes the second part of my thesis: they know who voted for Lula father? Know who the Laius Oedipus Garanhuns with this record distorted? FHC! Lula can only be understood if killing entire FHC, which he does all day, trying to eliminate it from history. The lack of superego explains that vanity and unreasonable that God complex. But I leave this fascinating mind for later.

I now return to the project. Parents today imposing a cruel punishment to their children are punished. If, despite the punishments laid down, the beating or mistreatment happen, we have the evidence that the law does not deter them. It is a matter of logic: if the subject does not fear the law banning the most, will not fear the law banning the least.

So the law of Lula, who nationalized our children, seeking to punish the parents of slapping possible, sometimes necessary, to curb a behavior inconvenient. The Babalorixá proposed a law that leaves violent criminals or psychopaths always been and where it comes to punishing ordinary people. Actually, it is the same mental mechanism that resulted in that stupid referendum on disarmament. Wanted to ban the sale of legal guns - usually bought by law-abiding citizens. It happens that Brazil's problem were and are illegal weapons, the banditry. Well, in that case, the State could not do anything ... Who's Lula to say how we should raise our children? The existing laws are enough to punish violent.

I have two daughters, 13 and 15 years, and my blog is public. They can read me. Never even gave them a spanking at all. Occasionally, rare, arrived at the "almost." I got my parents one time or another. I have 48 years already. I'm not from a time when the child was an untouchable majesty, a candidate small domestic terrorist - and then social life. Sometimes, I well knew why he was taking some flicks; others, felt a tremendous injustice. I have also learned there, to distinguish right from wrong? It's possible.

If I were to advise, I would say: "Do as I do, even to avoid spanking, try to talk and other forms of punishment." But this is a decision within the limits of existing laws, it is only to families. The state must not meddle in the relationship. Soon, one of those rowdy ladies, placed to say how we care for our homes, will also want to get involved in feeding our children - we're idiots, we need experts and NGOs to look to it. Someone will propose to punish the parents because the children are either very thin or obese.

In November last year I was in Programa do Jô. Many of you watched the interview or have seen on Youtube. I often say that in matters of Lula and the PT, I would never mistake, just me anticipate a little. If you do not want to see everything, I recommend, illustrating this post and also what is below, only the last 50 seconds, from 7min13s.

Lula has not said how we have sex, but have walked in counseling, in those days, on how we should treat this matter with our children. Considering a confession he gave to Playboy magazine in 1978, which I reproduce, I think we dismiss the teacher.
"One kid at that time [childhood] with 10, 12, had sexual experience with animals ... We did a lot more dirty than the kids do today. The world was more free. "

Lula does not seem a good teacher in the education of children or sex education. To stay away from our families. It would be a gain for the Republic if he controlled his.

PS: In the comments, if possible, ignore the question zoological. What is at issue is how far the state can meddle in our lives.
By Reinaldo Azevedo

๑۩۞۩๑๑۩۞۩๑๑۩۞۩๑๑۩۞۩๑๑۩۞۩๑

Sphere: Related Content