The Man Who Invented Our World
More than anyone else, Steve Jobs shaped modern technology—and modern life.
I saw the news of Steve Jobs’ death
on a device that he invented—the iPhone—and I’m writing on another
machine that he willed into being: the graphical interface computer. I
happen to be using a PC running Windows, with generic hardware I put
together myself; technically, only my keyboard was made by Apple. But
none of that matters. Just like the touch-screen smartphone and, now,
the tablet computer, the PC that you and I use every day became
ubiquitous thanks mainly to this one man. I’ll go further: Whether
you’re yearning for a Kindle Fire or a BlackBerry PlayBook, whether you
play Angry Birds on an iPod Touch or Google’s Nexus Prime, whether
you’re a Mac or a PC, you’ve succumbed to Steve Jobs’ master plan.
You may consider this praise too broad. After all, the tech industry
is unstoppable. Machines progress thanks to the work of thousands of
programmers, hardware engineers, assemblers, and research scientists at
hundreds of large and small firms in Silicon Valley and around the
world. Jobs, who quit college and was never trained in software or
hardware engineering, lacked much of the formal expertise needed to
power the computer revolution. Jobs didn’t make microchips go faster, he
didn’t increase the capacity of hard drives, he didn’t invent optical
storage drives, bitmapped graphics, cellular radios, Ethernet, or even
the mouse. If Jobs wasn’t around, we’d have had all of these advances
anyway—and people like Bill Gates, Andy Grove, Michael Dell, and Larry
Page would have turned these technologies into computers, phones, and
music players.
If Steve Jobs hadn’t been around, what might that stuff have looked
like? To appreciate how Jobs changed what you do every day, you’ve only
got to look at how entire industries shifted after Jobs pushed Apple
into them. Think of the BlackBerry, the Palm Pilot, the Creative Nomad music player, or MS-DOS.
These are all perfectly serviceable technologies, things that got the
job done. But none of them was transcendent. None was a dream to use,
and most were a pain.
More importantly, they all represented the logical, Darwinian end
point of major technological trends. The BlackBerry is the obvious
result of smaller processors, smaller screens, and better cellular
radios. If Research in Motion hadn’t created it, someone else would
have. The iPhone, though, was not an inevitability. Every single thing
about that device was the product of deep research, testing, and
unyielding refinement. The “Jesus phone”
underlines Jobs’ place at the head of this business. While every other
company in tech has been shaped by the forces of technological
evolution, with their products getting better as chips got faster and
cheaper, Jobs had no patience for evolution. He was the intelligent
designer.
Jobs’ best talent was his ability to spot the pain points in every
technology he touched. He could look at anything and tell you why it
sucked. This became his standard formula for unveiling new products: He
would begin by explaining what was awful about the industry he would
soon supplant. Old-style smartphones? They were encumbered
with buttons that were there whether you needed them or not, and that
remained static for every application you used, leaving very little room
for a screen. Portable music players?
The ones before the iPod stored too few songs, transferred your music
too slowly, didn’t catalog your tracks in any useful way, and were too
large and ungainly to carry with you. Pre-iPad tablet PCs? If you got
him started on those things, you’d be there all day.
There’s a school of Jobs hagiography that suggests he personally invented solutions to all these problems. (This is nicely parodied in a story the Onion once ran, “Frantic Steve Jobs Stays Up All Night Designing Apple Tablet.”) But although Apple assigned his name to hundreds of patents,
Jobs wasn’t Apple’s idea man. Rather, his role was to separate other
people’s great ideas from their terrible ones—and to refine the best
ideas into workable products. He did this, most famously,
with the mouse, a gadget he’d encountered on a trip to Xerox’s research
facility in Palo Alto in 1979. Jobs instantly saw that it could
redefine computing, and he worked feverishly to turn the research into
something useful. He cribbed other parts of the Mac from Jef Raskin, a
legendary computer interface expert at Apple who’d come up with several
of the key concepts for graphical computing.
But Jobs didn’t just grab other people’s best concepts. He also drew
inspiration from other, more far-flung domains. After dropping out of
Reed College when he was 17, Jobs bummed around campus looking for
something to do. He’d heard about Reed’s strong calligraphy program, so
he decided to take some classes. “I learned about serif and san serif
typefaces, about varying the amount of space between different letter
combinations, about what makes great typography great,” he said in a commencement speech at Stanford in 2005 (which is one of the best accounts of his life you’ll ever see). “It was beautiful, historical, artistically subtle in a way that science can't capture, and I found it fascinating.”
He added:
None of this had even a hope of any
practical application in my life. But ten years later, when we were
designing the first Macintosh computer, it all came back to me. And we
designed it all into the Mac. It was the first computer with beautiful
typography. If I had never dropped in on that single course in college,
the Mac would have never had multiple typefaces or proportionally spaced
fonts. And since Windows just copied the Mac, it's likely that no
personal computer would have them. If I had never dropped out, I would
have never dropped in on this calligraphy class, and personal computers
might not have the wonderful typography that they do. Of course it was
impossible to connect the dots looking forward when I was in college.
But it was very, very clear looking backwards 10 years later.
Jobs’ logic is hard to argue with here. If he hadn’t brought
proportional typefaces to the Mac—if the Mac had never existed—it’s
difficult to think of anyone else who would have. Microsoft? Dell? No
way. This sounds like a small thing—so what if we had ugly fonts?—but
you could make a similar argument for everything else Jobs pushed for,
from touch-screen interfaces to the App Store model of downloading
software. These things would never have hit the mainstream if he hadn’t
come up with them first.
I’ve seen Jobs dozens of times as a reporter. I’ve gotten to ask him
questions, and I’ve had a chance to see him chat up VIPs at product demo
stations after he’s unveiled something great. I’ve read pretty much
everything written about him, and spoken to many people who’ve worked
with him. Still, he’s always been a mystery to me. I’ve never been able
to understand just why he was at good at spotting and creating the best
things in tech.
Last weekend my wife and I were taking a walk with our baby not far
from downtown Palo Alto, and I realized that we weren’t too far from
Jobs’ house. I’d only ever seen it from the car, so I wanted to see if
we could get closer. Part of this was plain nosiness. But I was also
curious to see if I could somehow get closer—to get some
insight into some part of his world. We walked a bit out of our way,
then turned a corner onto Jobs’ street. There were some big guys who
looked like security guards outside, as well as Jobs’ license-plate-free silver Mercedes.
It’s a beautiful house, though nothing as grand as the other
multimillion-dollar residences on his street. The most obviously Jobsian
touch were the half dozen apple trees in the yard. We walked slowly
past the house, but I wasn’t feeling any closer to Jobs.
But I was going about it wrong. For decades, Jobs was nearly alone in
the computer industry in his belief that it was better for users if a
single company made every part of every device. In an age ruled by
mediocre modularity—where one company makes your hardware, another makes
your software, and another bundles ads and crapware onto the
machine—Jobs saw electronics as an expression of a fierce, if
inscrutable, artistic vision.
It’s that vision that defined him, and perhaps it’s only through the
products his company made that we can ever hope to understand him. The
major touchstones of the Jobs aesthetic are obvious—in hardware,
software, retail, marketing, and even office design, he believed in
elegance and minimalism. From a broader perspective, he believed in
fighting against inertia. This was true of his plan for Apple—in 1997,
he wouldn’t stand for its obsolescence—as well as for the gadgets he
delivered. When I look at my iPhone, my iPad, my MacBook Air, or the
beautiful Apple keyboard that I’m typing on now, I see more of Jobs than
I could have ever hoped to glimpse outside his house. These products
came about because one man understood that machines didn’t have to be
the way they were. Steve Jobs didn’t just want technology to change. He
made it happen, and thanks to him the world is a much different, much
better place.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário